The aim of this course is to prepare you to write things worth reading, and writing, at the college level. We'll operate on three premises:
Writing is THINKING
Writing is a PROCESS
Writing is a CONVERSATION
To practice the essential elements of academic argument—thesis, motive, stakes, and structure (to name just a few)—we'll take childhood as our subject.
The French modernist poet Charles Baudelaire famously called genius “childhood rediscovered at will,” and painters and writers of the 20th century looked to childhood for inspiration in their works. Their interest in childhood speaks to the prevalent attitude that children have curiosity, joy, and authenticity that are often lost after the transition to adulthood.
But we didn't always see children this way, nor is our current view of childhood so one-sided. On the contrary, historians have argued that prior to the 17th century children were often seen as faulty adults, and Christian doctrine considered them born into sin. Moreover, today, many argue that not all young people get to partake equally of notions of childhood innocence, as some childhoods are valued more highly than others. There also exists a contradiction in our cultural attitude toward children: to call someone “childlike” might be a compliment and “childish,” critique, and furthermore the perception of how grown men and women partake of children’s qualities differs. As these two words suggest, we can’t seem to decide if childhood is a state to be cherished and preserved at all costs or a condition to be overcome.
In this course, we’ll take as our starting point the idea that much of what we think constitutes childhood today is actually a historical construction. As such, we see, children are particularly liable to be spoken for and about.
BUT HOW WELL DO ADULTS REALLY UNDERSTAND CHILDHOOD, OR CHILDREN FOR THAT MATTER?
WHAT DO ADULTS' IDEAS ABOUT BOTH CHILDHOOD & CHILDREN SAY ABOUT THEM?